![]() |
||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||
|
No-fault Derelict Gear Recovery: An End to the Blame Game Leads to Successful Gear-removal in Puget Sound Gary Wood, J.D., Northwest Straits Commission
Ghost nets
so called by divers because monofilament is invisible underwater2 entangles divers and swimmers, often with fatal results; while
huge trawl nets damage propellers and rudders, putting even the largest
oceangoing vessels and crews in peril. At a minimum, such
gear continues to do what it was designed to do: entangle and kill fish.
At loose in the benthic environment each net becomes a veritable killing
field trapping fish and fin even shellfish, crabs, birds
and marine mammals, including endangered or threatened species
depending on the site. Each entanglement becomes bait for the next,
in turns, so the nets passively fish up the food chain.
The consequence of this historic accumulation is an unobserved
mortality that continues unabated in most harbors and oceans today.
The economic impact of these losses is inestimable. If such a wasteful carnage were to occur terrestrially, imagine the outcry for a solution. Obstacles
to Recovery Puget Sound presents
different challenges: the Northwest Straits are within a temperate,
deep inland sea with 100 years of commercial and sportfishing gear (and
centuries of tribal nets) hanging on its steep walls and draped on rocky
reefs along salmon migratory corridors. In 1999, several wild species
of salmon were listed under the Endangered Species Act, the first such
action within a metropolitan population and commerce center.3
Yet there had never
been a concerted effort to deal with the gear problem, other than one
report to the legislature deploring the nets problem, but confounded
to solve it because of liability issues. In fact, Washingtons
own state law was the major impediment to gear removal operations, unintentionally. At the time, a regulatory,
punitive approach that penalized commercial fishing operators who reported
gear losses constituted the sole redress of the problem. Considering
that the value of complex seine and trawl equipment is $15,000
$40,000, its loss is an immediate and severe economic blow often
cut loose to save a hapless fishing boat from its grasp. The added imposition
of a fine or license suspension for such reported losses, employing
classic legislative wisdom, was the lawful deterrent. Indeed,
reporting lost gear did cease, wholly deterred. Nonetheless, gear losses
and those unobserved mortalities persisted out-of-sight,
and out-of-mind. Commission Awarded
NOAA Grant Where appropriate,
the Commission undertakes regional projects that protect or restore
the areas marine resources. The derelict gear problem presented
an opportunity to design and initiate a pilot remediation program. Dr.
Andrea Copping of Washington Sea Grant co-authored (with this writer)
a successful funding proposal,5 and Sea Grant was instrumental
in building the projects team. The ensuing Northern Puget
Sound Derelict Gear Recovery Project developed, tested and duly
secured approval for new recovery protocols6 for removing
fishing gear from those cold, deep waters safely and with regard
for the surrounding habitats. New
Statute Adopted The legislature finds that fishing gear that is lost or abandoned may continue to catch marine organisms long after the gear is lost. The purpose of this act is to develop safe, effective methods to remove derelict fishing gear, eliminate regulatory barriers to gear removal, and discourage future losses of fishing gear.7 The projects
sponsors attacked the problem strategically, and removed the regulatory
barriers, while ensuring that future recovery efforts would be safe,
monitored and conducted in accord with the new protocols. The encouragement
was not lip service: the Commissions program introduced no-fault
to net recovery, and followed through by providing for a toll-free 1-800-Gear
Hotline9 and an on-line reporting website for
divers, fishermen, boaters, beach-goers and anyone involved with the
marine environment to report sightings with ease - in the water or on
shore.10 (Recreational scuba divers are strongly cautioned
in all program materials to avoid the gear because of the inherent dangers.)
Gear Location Database:
A GIS database of reported gear has been built to map recovery sites,
and help set priorities for removal efforts, based on threats to public
safety and marine resources, hazards to navigation and other criteria.
The gear locations are not made public. Removal Guidelines:
Another feature of the new statute required the states Fish &
Wildlife agency to draft removal protocols, in consultation with the
Commission and other experts: The Department of Fish and Wildlife,
Northwest Straits Commission, the Department of Natural Resources, and
other interested parties, must publish guidelines for the safe removal
and disposal of derelict fishing gear . . . by August 31, 2002.11 More importantly
the statute provided that, derelict fishing gear removal conducted
in accordance with the guidelines prepared in subsection (2) of this
section is not subject to permitting under RCW 77.55.100.12 Since that start,
commercial divers and vessels trained in the new protocols exempted
from permitting delays have been at work. They analyze hazards
with sidescan sonar and videography to reduce risks, then divers physically
remove the gear from the waters of the Northwest Straits, under surface
gases. During the first
year of the pilot effort fourteen state and federal agencies and other
organizations partnered onto the project. In September of 2003, the
project participants were awarded the prestigious 2003 Coastal America
Partnership Award.13 The Governor has even visited
the team at work, and the budget for gear removal has tripled, thanks
to those additional sponsors. They will need it; that new project database now contains over 160 locations of known derelict nets in Puget Sound.
|
|||||||||||||
|
Phone (662) 915-7775 • Fax (662) 915-5267 • 256 Kinard Hall, Wing E, University, MS 38677-1848
Sitemap • Please report any broken links/problems to the Webmaster |